Official denial
370,671
Published 2024-04-26
Direct link to Hansard
hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9…
Let me move to some of the questions that we must raise and answer today, openly and transparently, and with full access to ONS record-level data. I am not saying that that should be disclosed to all and sundry, but surely the Government cannot defend the position that they are not willing to release that information to interested clinicians and clinical academics as a minimum. Those are the people who need to interrogate the data. It is of little relevance to me—I do not have the means or academic ability to interpret it—but it is something that interested clinical academics should have access to.
Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood.
Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to the
Toggle showing location of Column 528
spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done.
In a recent written answer to me, it was confirmed that the MHRA has received 489,004 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction reports relating to the covid-19 vaccine, up to and including 28 February this year. Across the United Kingdom, 2,734 of those reports were associated with a fatal outcome. Of course the true number is unknown—that is the nature of yellow card reporting, as only a fraction of adverse events are reported—and that is probably because of limited public awareness about some of the potential consequences and complications of vaccines, and the well-understood under-reporting of those adverse events. That is important, because the yellow card system is a key element of safe and effective clinical care. If things are not being evaluated properly, I can think of no greater betrayal of the MHRA’s clinical governance responsibility. I suggest that accountability for that must be swift and decisive. The rigorous assessment of these data is essential and must be actioned urgently. Will the Minister now engage with the MHRA and invite it to come to the House to explain the facts on these reports?
Another issue, which arises from a further written question that I tabled, relates to the role of the MHRA. It has a crucial role—in fact, it is a statutory function—to provide post-marketing surveillance and to operate the yellow card system, but the Minister responded to my question about the assessment of the potential implications of the BMJ article “Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is ‘likely’ responsible for deaths of some elderly patients, Norwegian review finds” by stating:
“The MHRA communicates safety advice based upon consideration of the totality of evidence from all relevant information sources, rather than the strengths and limitations of individual data sources.”
Surely, a fundamental step in any meta-analysis of published data is to interrogate the robustness of those data and for the public to have confidence that that is happening.
All Comments (21)
-
The near-empty chamber is AN INSULT to the British people.... disgusting!
-
If they were discussing Mp's salaries, the house would be full. But the British people's medical treatment & health? Nah!! These people are a total disgrace to humanity.
-
They aren't in denial, they know everything. They are liars and dangerous people. You might say evil as a better description.
-
The government ISN’T in denial but rather In cahoots!!! Period
-
The first time that Andrew Bridgen stood up, he was alone. Ridiculed and shamed. Now, he is feared.
-
I'm pleased that it is not just Andrew Bridgen asking these questions. The more there are, the more difficult it is to shut them up.
-
Almost empty chamber, and, those that are there are playing on their phones.....I am soooooo tired of our elected officials ignoring this!!!!!
-
They are absent because they are guilty
-
Attendance needs to be MANDATED - theyre paid with OUR MONEY... These ppl OFFEND me 🤮
-
The American people would like to thank Dr. John Campbell for his service. We are forever grateful.
-
The alarm bells were ringing as soon as the Pharmaceutical companies got indemnity “If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, forced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized ... If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance -- you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest ” - Ian Watson
-
I will be writing to the local MP and ask why he wasn't there!! It's disgusting!!!!
-
They are all absent because they are all cowards.
-
Empty parliament!!!! What a disgrace
-
It’s a sad day when British Democracy is only represented by a few elected members. Hopefully the electorate votes out every bludger who has failed to attend this debate.
-
The worst medical crime in history.
-
The fact that they still post a Covid vaccine “learn more” on everything tells me everything I need to know. 👎
-
This is murder...
-
"You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality...."
-
To the Brits angry that the House is empty; you’re still ahead of America. At least SOMEONE in your government is talking about this within your government’s system. WE HAVE 0 VOICES standing or sitting in our 2 branches of Congress to discuss this issue. I don’t even know if there’s a subcommittee “investigating” this or interviewing big pharma reps. & if so, our subcommittee meetings are mere theater. So, my friends across the pond, take comfort in knowing that at least you’re not America where this subject is being ignored IN ITS ENTIRETY at all levels of government.
