Outrageous excess deaths

1,121,014
0
Published 2024-04-18
Direct link to TV Parliament site, parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9…
That this House has considered the covid-19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths; and calls on the covid-19 inquiry to move onto its module 4 investigation into vaccines and therapeutics as soon as possible.

We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country in living memory, and possibly ever: the excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Its causes are complex, but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a covid vaccine is a large part of the problem. I have been called an anti-vaxxer, as if I have rejected those vaccines based on some ideology. I want to state clearly and unequivocally that I have not: in fact, I am double vaccinated and vaccine-harmed. Intelligent people must be able to tell when people are neither pro-vax nor anti-vax, but are against a product that does not work and causes enormous harm to a percentage of the people who take it.

I am proud to be one of the few Members of Parliament with a science degree. It is a great shame that there are not more Members with a science background in this place; maybe if there were, there would be less reliance on Whips Office briefings and more independent research, and perhaps less group-think. I say to the House in all seriousness that this debate and others like it are going to be pored over by future generations, who will be genuinely agog that the evidence has been ignored for so long, that genuine concerns were disregarded, and that those raising them were gaslit, smeared and vilified.

One does not need any science training at all to be horrified by officials deliberately hiding key data in this scandal, which is exactly what is going on. The Office for National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations—it no longer does so, and no one will explain why. The public have a right to that data. There have been calls from serious experts, whose requests I have amplified repeatedly in this House, for what is called record-level data to be anonymised and disclosed for analysis. That would allow meaningful analysis of deaths after vaccination, and settle once and for all the issue of whether those experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths.

Far more extensive and detailed data has already been released to the pharma companies from publicly funded bodies. Jenny Harries, head of the UK Health Security Agency, said that this anonymised, aggregate death by vaccination status data is “commercially sensitive” and should not be published. The public are being denied that data, which is unacceptable; yet again, data is hidden with impunity, just like in the Post Office scandal. Professor Harries has also endorsed a recent massive change to the calculation of the baseline population level used by the ONS to calculate excess deaths. It is now incredibly complex and opaque, and by sheer coincidence, it appears to show a massive excess of deaths in 2020 and 2021 and minimal excess deaths in 2023. Under the

Toggle showing location of Column 505
old calculation method, tried and tested for decades, the excess death rate in 2023 was an astonishing 5%—long after the pandemic was over, at a time when we would expect a deficit in deaths because so many people had sadly died in previous years. Some 20,000 premature deaths in 2023 alone are now being airbrushed away through the new normal baseline.

Shocking things happened during the pandemic response. In March 2020, the Government conducted a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should have “do not resuscitate” orders, known as DNRs, imposed upon them. A document summarising the proposals was circulated to doctors and hospitals; it was mistakenly treated as formal policy by a number of care homes and GPs up and down the country, who enacted it. At the same time, multiple hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNRs, because they thought that they would be overwhelmed. The result was that people died who did not need to die while nurses performed TikTok dances.

All Comments (21)
  • @andypearson2571
    If the establishment think that they can ignore, put their finger's in their ears , obfuscate and gaslight their way out of this, THEY ARE WRONG
  • @69mosshead
    The lack of MP's there shows their contempt for the public.
  • @user-dt4jt2ys2l
    The Nuremberg code needs to be enacted and those responsible need to be held accountable!!
  • @londonerwalks
    Disgusting that only 15 MPs attended this important debate. All the other MPs should be sacked . They do not represent us. Madam speaker is obviously disturbed there is huge support for Mr Bridgen in the public gallery.
  • The real pandemic is the plague of political corruption. Thank the Lord for the heroic Andrew Bridgen.
  • The almost empty room is proof that the present English political system needs radical change.
  • @dalejerden1878
    Suppressing someone's respiratory system while having a respiratory illness making it hard to breathe is murder‼️‼️‼️
  • My hero. Dr. Campbell And Mr. Bridgen. Thank you on behalf of the world.
  • @t44WD
    i lost my job .but not my life and my dignity Thanks Dr.Campell
  • The lack of common decency from the vast majority of MP's is staggering. They couldn't be more contemptuous if they tried!
  • I work in long term care. The number of deaths are unbelieveable. This is heartbraking.
  • @CaroleMatheson
    There needs to be an uprising 😡 Andrew Bridgin is nearly doing all this alone !!! What the hell is going on. Why are we standing for this 😡