Purplecliffe Reacts to "Pokémon, but We Can Only Catch 1 Pokémon"

1,151,265
0
2021-08-11に共有

コメント (21)
  • honestly props to john for immediately getting on board when jack brings up operation pudding even though he had no idea what was going on
  • @kez092
    “you lost” “you won!!” That one person in the chat: “your real name is Jack?”
  • Argument for all three Jack: while hacking is seen as wrong, it was never specified that it was not allowed in this challenge. The only thing unrealistic about the hacked pokemon was its level, otherwise, it was perfectly possible that a chingling could have been a pokemon he could have found and caught. Jacks chingling was no different than any other pokemon he could have found. John rightfully traded with him, giving Jack a Rikou, which should have given him the win. John: The challenge was to CATCH a pokemon stronger than your opponents. Jack's hacked pokemon was therefore not caught and should immediately disqualify him, meaning John cannot trade with him. John still has his Rikou, which is stronger than a snorlax. Therefore, John should have won. Michael: Because of reasons already stated, Jacks hacked pokemon was against the rules and therefore disqualifies him. Even so, John still chose to trade away his Rikou, meaning no matter what he does not have it. Whether his new pokemon is the chingling, no pokemon at all, or even if it somehow bounces back and the trade happens with Mikey, he still ends up with a weaker pokemon than Mikey's. Therefore, Michael should have won. In conclusion, these three are bumbling idiots who put their one brain cell together for our amusement.
  • Operation pudding had me in tears. It was like a full story. A setting, then the climax, then the after math
  • Jack hacked in a Chingling, John chose to trade away his Raikou, meaning he doesn't have it anymore no matter what and Mikey cheated by creating a random new rule. You three lost. The audience won. That's the final veredict.
  • Nobody won, everyone made a major mistake Mikey: Witheld some of the rule John: Traded away a Raikou Jack: Hacked in a Pokemon
  • There is nothing funnier then Jack laughing at his own jokes and agreeing with himself
  • As someone who’s comment—apparently—was seen by Jack near the end, I can confidently say the best way they can solve this tie is actually by playing one more real Round. Whether onscreen or off.
  • All three of you have flaws with your final argument: Jack: Outright cheated John: Willingly traded away a legendary Mikey: Is trying to spin this as if the trade did and didn't take place at the same time With that said, I feel that John wins because he's the only one who neither cheated nor attempted to cheat. Checkmate. 🙃
  • @LittleWooper151
    i wish these 3 would record and make videos together again. i miss this.
  • John hands down has got to be the best comedic wingman. On the spot was on board with operation pudding 🤣
  • 22:17 "What are these ads?" Everyday I ask that question whenever I open Pokemon Database.
  • If jack didn’t say what level the chingling was he could’ve easily gotten away with it and just won “fair and square”
  • jack still lost because he didn't catch a pokemon the last round,and one of the rules state that if you didn't a pokemon,you lose
  • John wins by virtue of being the only one who didn't cheat
  • @ball.3841
    John won the competition Jack won the mindgames
  • Jack spent the 60+ minutes recording this making Mikey's brain just melt, and if that's not a win, I don't know what is
  • In my opinion Mikey lost. Idk who wins but Mikey had no reason to win, Jack's reason was he ended up with the strongest pokemon, which was mikeys rule that he altered to make him win, and John's reason was that he caught the strongest pokemon And could only trade it away because of mikeys cheat rule