If Pixar Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes #2
250,617
Published 2024-04-23
Make sure to like and subscribe for more Villains being charged for their crimes!
šCanāt Get Enough of Dinsey Villains? And Want To Support The Channel?!
Try out Villainous! A board game full of fun with your favourite baddiesš
amzn.to/44j9UTk
#ad #CommissionsEarned
š„Support me with the grind:
www.buymeacoffee.com/animatedcourtroom
šµ Music used: share.epidemicsound.com/4kuo8f
š Voice over used: elevenlabs.io/?from=partnerlewis3749
0:00 Case 1: Charles Muntz
5:24 Case 2: Chef Skinner
9:38 Case 3: Auto
12:35 Case 4: Ernesto de la Cruz
16:14 Case 5: Hopper
Disclaimer:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Animated Cour
All Comments (21)
-
Charles Muntz would also be charged for illegal poaching and breaking the endangered species act
-
Honestly for skinner this has to be the lightest sentence a villian has ever gotten
-
Technically, Auto doesn't do anything wrong since he's following a direct order from the BNL company president, who holds a higher position than the Axiom's captain. The president told him, "Go FULL autopilot and do not return to Earth." This implies that whatever Auto sees fit to follow that executive order is within the law of the Axiom. The person at fault is the BNL president, whose gross negligence and refusal to adapt to change resulted in the danger of thousands of people.
-
i would argue that auto was following the orders from his superior that is long gone, thus making his actions of not going back under ANY circunstances valid.
-
If jury duty was like this, Iād never get tired of it!
-
Wasn't Muntz technically tracking his dog, something that is arguably his property? That charge, with a good lawyer, be dropped if that was the only crime he commited.
-
10:12 Death sentence for robots should be called "Dismantle" sentence
-
0:49 It's Heavily Implied That He Killed Both the Surveyor and the Botanist Because of The Bird, The Years of Isolation in Paradise Falls Has Caused Him To Go Mad
-
Skinner is guilty off attempting to keep his Kitchen Sanitary
-
I think Charles Muntz killed more than just the surveyor and botanist, judging from all those helmets.
-
5:22 funny how the one NOT with a death sentence charge fucking died.
-
If jack sparrow was charged for his crimes
-
Charles Muntz really is fit enough for a fight with Carol .
-
You forgot for Charles Muntz trying to kill an endangered species
-
Can we talk about how insanely old Muntz must be? He was an adult when Carl was a child. Dude must be 100 š
-
God dang it, seeing wall-E get stuck in there still makes me tear up man
-
You forgot to charge Charles months with reckless, endangerment and unlicensed use of a firearm because we donāt know that gun he used was licensed
-
I think Hopper committing slavery over a civilization falls under Crimes Against HumANTity
-
I think Skinner may have trespassed 3 times actually. Pretty sure you can't just barge into a restaurant kitchen you don't work in without permission or an escort, but it may be different in France. (And at the point he barged in, he had been fired.) And I doubt he had the correct licenses and training required to trap Remmy like he did. In France, you must "have an approval provided by a training course." in order to become a trapper. And Ernesto definitely committed some child abuse by throwing and dragging poor Miguel around.
-
I wouldn't consider AUTO for being a villain because he's a robot. He's basically doing what he is programed to do: To keep people away from earth
