The Most Controversial Problem in Philosophy

4,272,661
0
Publicado 2023-02-11
For decades, the Sleeping Beauty Problem has divided people between two answers. Head to brilliant.org/veritasium to start your free 30-day trial, and the first 200 of you will get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

▀▀▀
Many thanks to Dr. Mike Titelbaum and Dr. Adam Elga for their insights into the problem.

▀▀▀
References:

Elga, A. (2000). Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem. Analysis, 60(2), 143-147. - ve42.co/Elga2000

Lewis, D. (2001). Sleeping beauty: reply to Elga. Analysis, 61(3), 171-176. - ve42.co/Lewis2001

Winkler, P. (2017). The sleeping beauty controversy. The American Mathematical Monthly, 124(7), 579-587. - ve42.co/Winkler2017

Titelbaum, M. G. (2013). Ten reasons to care about the Sleeping Beauty problem. Philosophy Compass, 8(11), 1003-1017. - ve42.co/Titelbaum2013

Mutalik, P. (2016). Solution: ‘Sleeping Beauty’s Dilemma’, Quanta Magazine - ve42.co/MutalikQ2016

Rec.Puzzles - Some “Sleeping Beauty” Postings - ve42.co/SBRecPuzzles

The Sleeping Beauty Paradox, Statistics SE - ve42.co/SBPSSE

The Sleeping Beauty Problem, Reddit - ve42.co/SBPReddit

Sleeping Beauty paradox explained, GameFAQs - ve42.co/SBPGameFAQ

The Sleeping Beauty Problem, Physics Forums - ve42.co/SBPPhysicsForums

▀▀▀
Special thanks to our Patreon supporters:
Tj Steyn, Meg Noah, Bernard McGee, KeyWestr, Elliot Miller, Brian Busbee, Jerome Barakos, M.D., Amadeo Bee, TTST, Balkrishna Heroor, Chris LaClair, John H. Austin, Jr., Eric Sexton, john kiehl, Anton Ragin, Benedikt Heinen, Diffbot, Gnare, Dave Kircher, Burt Humburg, Blake Byers, Evgeny Skvortsov, Meekay, Bill Linder, Paul Peijzel, Josh Hibschman, Mac Malkawi, Mike Schneider, jim buckmaster, Juan Benet, Ubiquity Ventures, Richard Sundvall, Lee Redden, Stephen Wilcox, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Michael Krugman, Cy 'kkm' K'Nelson, Sam Lutfi.

▀▀▀
Written by Emily Zhang, Derek Muller, Tamar Lichter Blanks
Edited by Fabio Albertelli
Animation by Ivy Tello, Fabio Albertelli, Jakub Misiek
Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images & Pond5
Music from Epidemic Sound
Thumbnail by Ignat Berbeci
Produced by Derek Muller, Petr Lebedev, Emily Zhang

Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @veritasium
    If you want to vote by liking/disliking the video: “Agree with me” means 1/3 and “Disagree” means 1/2. Latest update (Nov 23, 2023): 217,332 agree with me, and 97,502 disagree with me.
  • @sinistril
    "What coin? What are you talking about? Where am I? Who are you?"
  • @lexxynubbers
    As a Canadian, I would be quite happy for a 20% chance of winning against Brazil
  • @a_mouse6858
    When I reached your poll, I didn't understand the controversy. If the question is "What is the probability that the coin WILL be heads?" the answer is 1/2. If the question is "What is the probability that the coin WAS heads?" is 1/3. These are two completely different questions. The first has to do with flipping a coin. The second is about what day it is.
  • My reactions when I see a Veritasium video. Amazed by the title-> Understands the concept-> Trying to understand deeply-> Gets lost-> Forgets what was the video about-> Perplexed about the reality-->Video ends->Hits the like button.
  • @dukemagus
    Lessons learned: never let a researcher put you to sleep and never pay them in cash
  • Whenever there's no consensus in probability puzzles like this one, it usually does boil down to subtle disagreements about what is actually being asked, not the answers themselves.
  • @laurineder9939
    Derik: vote with like and dislike button Youtube: makes dislikes invisible
  • For me it becomes less paradoxical when I think of the question as rephrased as "How likely is it that Heads is responsible for you waking up this particular time?"
  • @jo_devs
    If sleeping beauty was asked "What's the probability the coin came up heads?", I think she should say 1/2. If she was asked "What's the probability that you've been woken up as part of the outcome of a heads result?", I think she should say 1/3. I think the key thing with this question and the reason there isn't (and probably can't be) consensus comes down to how it's communicated and how we as individuals interpret what's being asked of us with the answer. If your goal is to reinforce your understanding about how the coin works, you are probably a halfer. If your goal is to be correct in answering the question from the perspective of sleeping beauty, you are probably a thirder.
  • @topherhenny5268
    I'm changing my answer to 1/2 - it doesn't matter how many times she is woken up the probability the coin came up heads in the initial toss remains the same. The experiment where you count your coin toss and then mark the outcome as either Monday heads, Monday tails, Tuesday tails - is seeing the chance of being woken up by a heads flip. This is different to the probability of the initial flip.
  • @user-hp2my9iz3d
    In my opinion the question you seem to ask is: What is the probability that today isn’t Monday? The probability of a coin flip is always a coin flip as we say(50-50).. but the question refers to the coins state only in regard to what day it might be.. meaning that if it was H she’ll be asked once, while if it was T she’ll be asked twice, so it’s not really a philosophical problem, just that the question appears to be misleading
  • @mohdansar4927
    I'm a simple man. The probability of everything is always 50-50. It either happens, or it doesn't.
  • @Asterism_Desmos
    “Do not hit the like button” 87 people instantly ignored him
  • @hockeyholic8
    It's 1/2, think of it like this. You randomly get assigned a red or blue magnet, which you cannot see. They only attract coins of the same color. You are given a bag with 1 million blue coins and 1 single red coin. You will then stick in and pull out a coin with your unknown color magnet. What is probability that reaching in with the unknown color magnet that it will pull out a red coin? If the random 50% chance assigned you a red one you will therefore will pull out the 1 red coin. If the 50% chance assigned you a blue magnet, therefore you will pull out a blue coin, which will be one of those 1 million blue coins. The 1 red coin will always be pulled every time yours is red, but any specific blue coin (outcome) will only be pulled one / one millionth of the time yours is blue, the 50% blue probability is split amongst the one million blue coins you have a random chance at pulling, so those specific outcomes has far less weighted probability than the red coin. The red magnet's 50% will never split its probability because there's only 1 coin. More blue coins added just further dilutes the probablity of any specific coin being pulled from the blue magnets probability, but the sum will always still just be 50%.
  • @zodiakgames
    Its not that theres a 1 in 3 of heads, its a 1 in 3 that she was awoken for it being heads
  • @jasont8354
    The experimenters look on in horror as the coin rests upon its edge. They somberly pull the sheet over Sleeping Beauty's face. After an appropriate period of silence, Erwin asks, "You guys wanna put my cat in a box with an unstable nucleus, a hammer, and a vial of nerve gas?" "Not again, Erwin..."
  • @DqsHidden
    "Waking up on Monday with head" gets me every time.
  • @051adam
    I'm extremely happy you posted this content! Pure creative thought in action is a beautiful art form! ...and more importantly there's so many perspectives on this idea! Anyway... just really happy to see someone explain this so well! Thank you!
  • I think the question asked is really: "is this a heads day or a tails day?" and the chance of it being a tails day is twice as high as it being a heads day.