Beyond Infinity Number Comparison

33,524,384
0
Publicado 2020-06-07
Lets count from one to a a million, a googol, Graham's Number... all the way till infinity, and even how to count beyond infinity, into the uncountable infinities! We journey to see what amount of quantity for the all the people on earth, all the ants on earth, all the atoms in your body, all the stars in the universe and beyond. Every single mind-blown number you can think of, going bigger than infinity... this gets even more extreme!

Music Used:
Newtonia I by NAVIKMusic (Nevan Alexanian):    • Newtonia I - Nevan Alexanian (NAVIKMu...  
Newtonia II by NAVIKMusic (Nevan Alexanian):    • Newtonia II - Nevan Alexanian (NAVIKM...  
Do support and subscribe to his channel here: youtube.com/navikmusic

Kindly note several errors in the video (thanks to our viewers for spotting them):
69 should be the number of companies exceeding USD $100 BILLION as opposed to million.
172,000 is the usable words in Oxford Dictionary, the actual number is likely close to a 300K.
The number of data bytes ever created should be 10^22 instead of 10^20. The figure for 10^20 is outdated.
The number presented is not a Googolplex to the power of a Googolplex but rather 10^10^(100*(10^10^100)). Likewise for the Googolplex 3 times.
The figures for the number of games are the lower bound, as opposed to the total number of games.
The largest prime given should be the largest KNOWN prime found as of 2019.
The simplified version of infinities are incorrectly described. The ordinals should be ω•2, ω•3... instead of 2ω, 3ω...
The infinity symbol for inaccessible infinity is denoted as I instead of ε0, where ε0 refers to inaccessible from ω^ω...
The infinity symbol for indescribable infinity is denoted as Πn_m instead of ζ0.
The correct order would be ω, ω+1..., ω•2..., ω^ω...,ε0..., ζ0..., Γ...,ω_1...
A rectified version incorporating different elements and items will be coming soon...


List of items featured:
Number of Planets,
Number of letters in the English Alphabet,
Number of Companies worth over 100 billion usd,
Number of Countries as UN member states,
Number of Days in a year,
Number of Pokemon,
Number of Deaths from 911,
Number of Episodes of Jeopardy,
Number of Games on Steam,
Number of Aircraft on Earth,
Total number of English Words there are,
Total number of Movies ever released,
Total number of Reigarw Comparisons Subscribers,
Total number of people in New York City,
Total number of Wikipedia Articles,
Total number of heartbeats per year,
Total number of books in the Library of Congress,
Total number of Big Macs Sold,
Total number of cars on Earth,
Total number of humans on Earth,
Total number of photos on Instagram,
Total number of tweets on Twitter,
Total number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy,
Total number of trees on Earth,
Total number of messages on Whatsapp,
Total number of cells in our body,
Total amount of money on Earth,
Total number of ants on Earth,
Total amount of financial assets on earth,
Total number of all insects on earth,
Total number of 3x3 Rubik Cube combinations possible,
Total amount of bytes ever created by mankind,
Total number of grains on sand on a beach,
Total number of DNA base pairs in your body,
Avogadro's Number,
Total number of stars in our universe,
Total number of atoms in our body,
Total number of all bacteria on earth,
Total number of IP address that can be created,
Total number of 4x4 Rubik Cube combinations possible,
Total number of atoms on Earth,
Total mass of the universe,
Total number of Planck time since the Big Bang,
Total number of sand grains to fill the Universe,
Total number of 52 deck card combinations possible,
Total energy of the Universe,
Total number of 5X5 Rubik Cube combinations possible,
Total number of all fundamental particles in the Universe,
Total data capacity of the Universe,
Total number of years till the heat death of the Universe,
Googol,
Total number of every Chess games possible,
Total number of every Xiangqi games possible,
Total number of Planck Volume in the Universe,
Total number of Planck Units of space-time in the Universe,
Total number of every Go games possible,
Total number of QR codes that can be created,
Total number of 33X33 Rubik Cube combinations possible,
Total number of word pages possible using every character out there,
Total number of cattles in Archimedes Cattle Problem,
Total number of images that can ever be created,
Largest Prime Number,
Total number of videos that can ever be created,
Probability of a Boltzmann brain materializing this instant,
Googolplex,
Total number of Universe in our Multiverse,
Total number of arrangement of every particle in our universe,
Total number of years before our universe quantum resets itself,
Poincare Recurrence Time
Graham's Number
TREE(3)
Rayo's Number
Countable Infinity
Aleph Null,
Uncountable Infinity,
Aleph One,
Epsilon One,
Cantor Ordinal,
Feferman Schutte Ordinal,
Absolute Infinity

Todos los comentarios (20)
  • @cumsicle5307
    Everyone gangsta until the numbers become letters
  • @soupWRLD
    toddler: “i can count too tree!” me: i don’t think so
  • @ParaBeamwr
    One thing that boggles my mind is that if you were to generate a random positive integer, the chances of it being bigger than rayo’s number is almost 100%.
  • @MrBorderlands123
    Friend: The password is on the back of the router: The back of the router: Rayo's number
  • @sami9423
    I feel sorry for the guy who counted the grains of sand
  • @DarkRainbow4002
    I like how all the infinities are called various names that basically mean "impossible to count"
  • @cykacatt
    What is your favourite number??? " Yea its probably SSCG(SSCG(3)) "
  • @joethefoebeats
    Everyone gangsta until they pull out different types of infinity.
  • @rjjr7064
    "Sir we've run out of numbers!" "...tree"
  • @flipper-b8588
    Warning: This video contains a lot of extremely confusing things. If you have a fear of math, continue at your own risk.
  • I love that something that looks simple in the outside like a 4x4 rubik’s cube has more combinations than stars in the observable universe
  • @user-tx5pc8fe6d
    Everybody gangsta until "YOU" is not the last one, but the first one
  • As a mathematician I would like to provide a bit of constructive criticism/fact check about this entertaining video. Please don't take these personally :) Facts that were not (totally) correct about finities: - Number of english words: I suppose you got the 172'000 from Oxford dictionary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dictionaries_by_number_of_words ). However, those are only the words currently in use. 300'000 would be a better estimate of the number of english words. - Number of movies: The number 500'000 is not "incorrect", however, it is a very conservative estimate. 1 million would probably be closer to the truth,[1] in particular since many films are never commercially published. Number of grains of sand on a beach and the earth: It seems you got mixed up the number of grains of sand on a single beach and the whole earth? Indeed, according to [2], there are about 7.5 * 10^18 grains of sand on the entire earth, not a single beach. (Edit: I got this one wrong.) - Number of data bytes ever created by mankind: Already by 2018, the International Data Corporation estimated that 33 zettabytes = 3.3 * 10^22 is the size of the global datasphere.[3] This is more than a hundred-fold of the 1 * 10^20 bytes you gave. - Number of chess games (!): Now this one could potentially be really wrong. You see, the estimate that you gave, 10^120, is only a lower bound on the number of chess games.[4] There could be quite a lot more chess games. A very crude upper bound is given by 10^27586.[5] An estimate of the number of "reasonable chess games" could be around 10^123. However, that is a bit speculative. - Largest prime number (!!): Now sorry about that, but as a mathematician this one pissed me off by far the most: There is no "largest prime number". This was already known to Euclid more than 2000 years ago.[6] What you meant is "largest known prime number". This is a subtle difference in wording but a big difference in meaning :) . - Boltzmann brain (!): The description suggests that Boltzmann brain formation is established physics, which is not the case.[7][8a][9] Now you can still state the number 10^10^69, but there should be a disclaimer that this is just a thought experiment and not established science. - Our multiverse: Again, this is not consensus.[8] I have to cut you some slack here because you correctly wrote down "based on chaotic inflation theory." - Time until the universe resets itself (!): Same issues as with Boltzmann brains but even more extreme. Facts that were not (totally) correct about infinities: - Replacement-inaccessible infinity (!!): Everything up to omega_omega is fine. But then you say that epsilon_0 = omega_omega_omega_... which could not be further from the truth! Indeed, epsilon_0 is a countable ordinal.[A] So it is smaller than even omega_1 ! Epsilon_0 is actually defined as the smallest ordinal epsilon satisfying epsilon = omega^epsilon. So you could write epsilon_0 = omega^omega^omega^... if you want. - Cantor's ordinal: Also countable.[B] - Feferman-Schütte ordinal: Also countable.[C] Small mistakes: - The "you" is missing in the list of items featured. - In that same list, I think it should "Number of letters" instead of "Number of Alphabets". Sources/Links: [1]: IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?title_type=feature,tv_movie,short&release_date=1800-01-01,2018-11-01 [2]: https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2012/09/17/161096233/which-is-greater-the-number-of-sand-grains-on-earth-or-stars-in-the-sky?t=1591620331854 [3]: https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/idc-seagate-dataage-whitepaper.pdf [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon_number [5]: https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/8331/ [6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_theorem [7]: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/06/urban_myths_in_contemporary_co.html [8]: http://www.hr.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/32/Staff/Emeritus_Professors/Prof_George_Ellis/Overview/philcosm_18_04_2012.pdf [8a]: Page 27 of [8] [9]: https://www.quora.com/Does-the-Poincare-recurrence-time-mean-that-there-will-be-Boltzmann-Brains-and-even-Boltzmann-Earths-in-the-very-far-future-in-an-open-universe [A]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon_numbers_(mathematics) [B]: https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Cantor%27s_ordinal [C]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feferman%E2%80%93Sch%C3%BCtte_ordinal
  • @LocalSlaveHolder
    Teacher: 1+1=2 Me: looking at my phone [10 seconds later] Teacher: TREE(5){(TREE(3))SSCG(3)℔℥ℌ℀Ω℅₺₩₱૱௹₹₸₵₡₲₳₢₠₥₣₯π∆∄∃∀ℇ∞∉⊊≫≩∐∏∛∭∭∰≖≟≠⅋⊛⊕}}
  • @brumomento3288
    Teacher: The Math exam won’t be that hard The math exam: