Steven Chu | Charlie Rose

6,108
0
Published 2009-03-10
Steven Chu, United States Secretary of Energy

SUBSCRIBE to get the latest from Charlie Rose: bit.ly/CharlieRoseSUBSCRIBE

Connect with Charlie Rose Online:

Visit the Charlie Rose WEBSITE: bit.ly/CharlieRoseDotCom
Like Charlie Rose on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/CharlieRoseFacebook
Follow Charlie Rose on TWITTER: bit.ly/CharlieRoseTwitter
Follow Charlie Rose on INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/CharlieRoseInstagram

About Charlie Rose:

Emmy award winning journalist Charlie Rose has been praised as "one of America's premier interviewers." He is the host of Charlie Rose, the nightly PBS program that engages America's best thinkers, writers, politicians, athletes, entertainers, business leaders, scientists and other newsmakers. USA Today calls Charlie Rose, "TV's most addictive talk show." New York Newsday says, "Charlie's show is the place to get engaging, literate conversation... Bluntly, he is the best interviewer around today."

Steven Chu | Charlie Rose
youtube.com/user/CharlieRose

All Comments (6)
  • @rudy4histo
    I love this guy, Nobel Prize winner and visionary energy guru to boot.
  • @Bobfils
    Why does no-one talk about the no ollution energy source that built the industrial revolution in this country - water power?
  • @seaplaneguy1
    When the cost of fuel becomes a small fraction of the capital cost, people don't care about fuel cost. What if you had a 500 mpg car ($800 for the life of the car)? Would you care about fuel costs over ten years when one bad battery could cost you 10k? The assumptions Mr Chue makes fall apart when the marginal cost if a small part of the total cost. Basic economics people! If we cut 90% of the need for fuel (25x9=225mpg city, soon to come!), what will a gal of gas cost? < $1? Wake up!
  • @seaplaneguy1
    Mr. Chu is again wrong. Ask..if I had a Nuke car that needed no fuel during it's life. How much more would you pay? An Otto engine is 10-20% city/highway. What if a new engine were 60-70% (here in 5 years!)? At $2/gal and 200k miles, old engine (25 mpg,say) burns 6 time as much fuel....8000 gal vs 8000/6=1333..net saving 6666gals. $16,000 vs 2666. If the car costs 26k, the new car fuel is only 10%...old is 60%. Fuel is then a small part, and the price of fuel does not matter as much...
  • @seaplaneguy1
    Jay, Did you actually read what I said above???? Try reading it a thousand times and then make an apology to me...thanks in advance... There is a way to get 70-90% of the fuel required out of the system...get it? Think before you comment...Turn your brain on, please...