Physicists Have Proven That the Universe Does Not Exist!

This is not a new concept. The Bible, The Bhagavad Gita, and a number of other religious texts have uncovered this. Even The Force touches on this in The Empire Strikes Back.

I'm going to bed I've got an headache.

We are all traveling souls on a wavelength of light

Thousands of years ago the greatest Vedantist Adhi Sankaracharya had asserted that the Universe, Time are illusions and not all living beings experience universe and time the same way! Only Consciousness is eternal and real but the universe and time are experiences in consciousness! Sakshi Chitanyam or witnessed illusions!

Ah! That explains why I didn’t see this video.

How does the holographic principle change our understanding of information and its role in shaping the universe?

The foolishness of the physicist is real.

Ok the universe doesn't exist, and everyone's always saying " the universe did this or that"-- never liked that comment....aaannnnd the moon is made of green cheese( sarcasm intended) don't even have the patience to watch to the end to see if they were just joking

Interesting

You present a distorted and inaccurate view of scientific understanding, and seem more interested in presenting a compelling narrative than in accurately representing the current state of scientific research. 1. False claim about physicists "proving" the universe doesn't exist: This statement is entirely false. Physicists do not claim the universe is an illusion in any literal sense. 2. Misunderstanding of quantum mechanics: While quantum mechanics introduces uncertainty and observer effects at the subatomic level, it doesn't mean everyday objects disappear when we don't look at them. You oversimplify and misrepresent the "observer effect." 3. Conflating scientific theories with speculation: You seamlessly blend the holographic principle (a theoretical framework) with unproven claims about consciousness, implying they are equally valid. 4. Misrepresenting the limitations of relativity: While the theory of relativity has limitations in explaining certain phenomena like black hole singularities, it remains a cornerstone of modern physics, accurately describing a vast range of gravitational interactions and making GPS and google directions possible. 5. Cherry-picking evidence and exaggerating claims: You use the example of the James Webb Space Telescope's findings to suggest current physics is fundamentally flawed, which is a misrepresentation. The telescope's observations push the boundaries of our understanding, but they don't invalidate existing theories. 6. Appealing to anecdotal evidence: The mention of Ingo Swan's remote viewing of Jupiter is an example of using anecdotal evidence to support extraordinary claims. 7. Sensationalism and clickbait tactics: The overall tone is sensationalistic, using phrases like "biggest lie of all time" and "universe of pure consciousness" to grab attention and create intrigue.

Such experiments as the double slit and the further double slit experiment with multi measuring Devices and the fact that gravity is not compatible with the quantum theory and that quantum & quantum wave theory is the accepted idea of the existence of matter, Further to the question of information loss from a black hole and the rotational difference of a Galaxy from the core to the outside are all the foundations for dark matter and the holographic principle, All are hypothes that try to reconcile the differences from observations, calculations and reality, Mankind is truly the Consciousness of the universe! And we question ourselves and our place in the reality we see, That we currently cannot explain with accepted theory!

Yeah right. Prove it totally?

why now declared all of this? u know all that and wont tell us before ?

All energy is in constant distribution and transformation through space/time a complete system

The use of the word "proven" invalidates the notion that this is a science video. Also, it's be copied. There is an author who promoted this theory, Robert Lanza.... but basically, it's more philosophy than science. You can't replace well tested ideas with theoretical ideas that cannot be tested. Also, even Lanza cannot come up with a way to test his hypothesis. So... meh. Clickbait

Think whatever you want, but not to include "The LORD, Creator of the Universe," is to deny our existence.

People have to stop writing about religion regard to science, Just think about it people in the past heard God's voice, That is merely schizophrenia maybe bipolar disorders, today we treat them with medication, Lots of people today hear voices and if you think that they should be followed as a religion then you must re-examine your own sanity and relationship with the world as it exists! Or please explain why people today do not hear the word of God but you think people 2000 years ago heard the voice of God, Or did a schizophrenic Make observations of life around them and no one knew about psychiatric illness, So how can you defend the fact that they heard voices but we're not sick?

I’m not convinced of this theory…it’s just too facile.

Ai, when will they snap out of it. I wonder why Sun that's the hottest. Just be humble and praise God.

Well duh. Read your Bible if you have one