LIVE CONVO: Karen Read's Mistrial with 13th Juror Podcast Host, Brandi Churchwell

the fact is , they did NOT prove this beyond a reasonable doubt - end of case - NOT GUILTY!

Proctor belongs in prison!!!

With even the medical examiner even saying his injuries weren't consistent with being hit at 24mph, the entire reason Lally put the ME up last was he needed at least one juror to have decided that Read was definitely guilty BEFORE hearing the me and disregarding that testimony.

The dog bites are also very clear.

The CW is corrupt to the bone!!!!

Proctor is just the tip of the iceberg...

It is just absolutely insane that jury didn't acquit. Shameful.

If he loses his job or is reprimanded in any way, it will be gold for the defense if they do go forward with a retrial. Unfortunately, if Bev is still on the bench, she'll be the judge again. If Read jad not gone looking for him that morning, the Canton PD would have put the snow plow driver up as the sacrificial lamb.

Proctor and these DIRTY COPS NEED TO HAVE ACCOUNTABILITY!!!

There was no documentation of evidence,no photographs, and no interview with the occupants of the house where the body on the lawn was found. Investigation 101. Wouldn't these be the first 3 things done in an investigation? Canton Police Department got the order to steer clear of 34 Fairview Rd. Almost like a Mafia boss is calling the shots. The first responder,that never came out of the house,to ask what is going on with the ambulance and fire trucks,also known as Brian Albert, would qualify as a mob boss. Nobody likes him,and everyone knows not to go near him and his orders.

Proctors been rehomed. Chloe’s been rehomed. Albert’s phones have been rehomed. Higgins phone could not be rehomed because he destroyed it.

Have you see Paul’s interview? I couldn’t watch it. I watched until he told why they believe Karen is guilty, then I turned it off. I already have negative feelings toward he and his mother. The way his mother behaved during the trial would have not gone over in any other courtroom in America. She was laughing when they were reading proctors text messages and I saw twice where the defense objected to something and she had her hands up and plop them down in her lap. Judges usually tell family members if they can’t keep from crying during autopsy or crime scene pictures to leave the courtroom. They don’t want the family to show any emotion. That tiny courtroom had the O’Keefe family directly in front of the jurors. Paul said the reason they KNEW she was guilty because of the way she behaved the day of John‘s death. They’re basing her guilt on her behavior, but they said in that courtroom and saw all that evidence that proved she did not hit him with her vehicle. She didn’t hit him with her vehicle then how did the tail light pieces get there? That’s where all the conspiracy ideas come from. That the Canton remnants of a drinking glass, and some blood. They blew the snow around with a leaf blower, and didn’t see one piece of bright red plastic! so many people like to say it’s strains credulity! (Sp?).

I still consider, that Jen, Brian, and Colin appearing in court for the closing arguments was a form of intimidation of some jurors. Someone on the internet made a point of Colin maybe knowing some juror's kids, having cross pass with them, might have something to do with his presence in the court.

They don’t all have to be in on anything….only a select group. The firefighters have been rumored to be corrupt as well so they may have been told what to say. I wouldn’t doubt that even the ppl in the house even knew…they could have kept it under wraps until they all left and then moved his body and came up with a story. The Albert’s, Mccabes and proctors absolutely know what happened to him.

Proof beyond "reasonable" doubt only applies when jurors aren't UNREASONABLE! For an effective jury panel, most people lack the requisite emotional intelligence to be fair & the ability to give someone grace in times of trauma or grief. They don't realize that people all respond differently when experiencing trauma, or that "not crying during the trial" isn't an indication of guilt. The lunatics who hear factual, credible, common sense evidence that the car didn't strike a person - and John's injuries weren't caused by a car - from the best independent experts in the nation used by the DOJ & NHL...and still refuse to accept their testimony as true - are serving on juries & putting innocent people in prison ALL over...ALL the time. So, why is this our chosen justice system? Any of us could be imprisoned for something we didn't do because of those people. There are countless examples of this happening to people who were later exonerated upon further investigation. We cannot stand for this. I don't want these people on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused of a crime! I don't want my freedom taken because of a few people's blind faith in law enforcement or critique of my facial expressions. Why do we put such an important decision in the hands of a jury with NO prerequisite IQ, education, life experience, or proven open-mindedness? Why wouldn't potential jurors have to pass a thorough screening interview, mental health assessment, psychological evaluation, or emotional intelligence screening? We all agree that our current system is wrought with human error & bias, yet we've done nothing to correct it in over 200 years! Without enacting a more rigorous jury screening process, here's how we could improve the process to ensure defendants receive the benefit of the doubt while preventing wrongful convictions: A "guilty" verdict must be unanimous. A 10-2 or 11-1 "not guilty" verdict is an acquittal. That way, 1 or 2 "unreasonable" people won't cause a mistrial!

She is INNOCENT!!

I learned alot from 13th jurror, just found her podcast last night, wow have I learned alot.

Karen lost her house, she sold it. Her job, her vehicle. Hope the Karen fund continues to grow.

Lucky, the snowplow guy who testified is having threats, intimidation and harassment towards him.

Polycarbonate tail lights do not shatter.