YouTube Copyright Claims and Copyright Strikes EXPLAINED!

Make sure to check all the links and resources in the video description! ⏱️TIMESTAMPS⏱️ 0:00 Intro 0:51 What happens when you get a copyright claim 2:18 What happens when you get a copyright strike 3:24 Copyright claims and content ID explained 4:47 Content ID options 5:41 Why content ID is a good thing 6:12 How to remove a copyright claim 7:48 Copyright strikes explained 8:14 Requesting a copyright takedown 8:42 The takedown process 9:12 What a copyright strike does to a channel

I got a copyright claim on my own music, disputed the claim, and because YouTube gives all the power to the alleged copyrights holder, it got rejected. Great system, love it!

Who voted copyright disappeared

Artist here! Got a copyright strike the other day since I had music in the background playing. It was copyright free music but apparently it’s only licensed for twitch livestreams and not YouTube. I got striked for “spam/deceptive practices” which REALLY sucks. I’ve decided to completely leave music out of everything now because I really want to monetize my art. Really really hoping my monetization isn’t affected by this down the line. It’s frustrating how something like this gets a strike and yet there are THOUSANDS of videos out there of full length movies, tv shows and cartoons that pass by without a problem. Seems SUPER unfair

Thanks for including the playlist on the end screen! I just wish it also had a video about copyright regarding fonts/typefaces. I'm not surprised that most of the attention gets focused on music copyright because music is so important to making a video and the automated tools make it easier for copyright holders to find matches, but I wonder if it's only a matter of time before they've created automated systems to find copyrighted fonts used in videos as well :\

Oof the “I’m not angry I’m disappointed” is the ultimate shame trip.

Forgot to mention how this is used to silence criticism nowadays

Outstanding explanation. Thorough, very clear, good visuals with text.

Finally someone answered the questions that's nowhere on the internet!!! copyright claims that only block viewing in one territory don't affect the rest of the channel! Thanks for you help

Thanks for making a video on this! I was really confused between the difference in copyright claims and strikes! :)

I've experiencing 3 videos with copyright claim and i noticed nobody notice my video or not interested on my videos. But after watching this, i start to delete instead my videos and i gain views. Thanks for sharing mate. Love ya ❤️

Thank you so much for this video I had no idea what to do and now I do!

This is the first video that really gets deep into this. It’s and arduous but important topic! 🙏🏻

one of my friend's friend had 22k subs on their channel and no copyright strikes or claims and their channel was terminated. He tweeted youtube but nothing happended. He is still not sure why his channel was terminated, and he probably lost a lot of revenue too.

Thank you so much 😁 also when you let us had 3 seconds to screenshot, that was honestly awesome of you cause I never seen an explanation video give you time to screenshot 😂 so thank you

I have got two before I looked it up but it didn’t help me figure out what it was thanks for the information

One of the issues with some of the "copyright claims" is that there are bot-sniffers that sniff out this data. At least when it comes to music. I can understand why, but to make a claim a human should have control of that, not a bot. Bots can flag. Humans can check, then claim. My church uploads the services on Sunday (the service is livestreamed on Facebook during the regular-church service time, and then uploaded to YouTube afterwards for those that couldn't watch it live), and A LOT of the hymns are public domain, a lot of the tunes are public domain; the music used when we were not able to meet falls under the license my church has for this content (with some hymns as exceptions, but none of those exceptions have been used); when we were still able to meet in person: the organist is live-playing the music. The videos would still get copyright claims within seconds of the upload being completed and/or processed (I can't remember which). The only way someone could possibly do that is if their sitting there staring at a screen waiting for a "copyright breach." Which leads me to believe that it's not a real person: it is a bot. Regardless of the copyright claims, my church has a license to use the content (as mentioned above). It's "hilarious" when the "copyright owner" tries to argue back and say that "they still feel like it's their content." It's also hilarious when they try to claim that a portion of the video is "violating copyright" when there's another portion earlier in the video (or later) that uses that same hymn. It's "hilarious" that they try to make a claim on a hymn that doesn't even go by the name they claim.... It's also "hilarious" that they're trying to claim public domain content in the first place. Also keep in mind: some of the hymns, tunes, etc. are over 200 years old.... [Side note: I know about these claims because my father is the Pastor, and is the one that is running the YouTube channel for the church, etc.]

Yes a family member was playing music in the background while I was recording and I didn’t even realise because it was so faint yet the company still put a claim in on me, I suppose it’s fair but at the same time I watch the video like three times and didn’t even notice it because it was so quiet

the video doesn't cover case: "Video cannot be monetised. The Content ID claim on your video doesn't affect your channel." When I have the license but have to wait a few days for acceptance, will I get the revenue back for the crucial viral period or will YT it not display any ads?

so basically if you receive a 3rd strike but a year after the previous 2 strikes it wont result in your channel termintaion ?