Chess Pro Explains How to Spot Cheaters (ft. GothamChess) | WIRED
5,777,290
Publicado 2022-11-28
Check out Levy's YouTube channel: youtube.com/@GothamChess
Director: Lisandro Perez-Rey
Director of Photography: Charlie Jordan
Editor: Louville Moore
Talent: Levy Rozman
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Samantha Vélez
Production Manager: Eric Martinez
Production Coordinator: Fernando Davila
Camera Operator: Corey Eisenstein
Audio: Brett Van Deusen
Production Assistant: Patrick Sargent
Post Production Supervisor: Alexa Deutsch
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Assistant Editor: Ben Harowitz
Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►► wrd.cm/15fP7B7
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►► link.chtbl.com/wired-ytc-desc
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►► subscribe.wired.com/subscribe/splits/wired/WIR_You…
Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►instagram.com/wired
Twitter ►►www.twitter.com/wired
Facebook ►►www.facebook.com/wired
Get more incredible stories on science and tech with our daily newsletter: wrd.cm/DailyYT
Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.
ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. Through thought-provoking stories and videos, WIRED explores the future of business, innovation, and culture.
Todos los comentarios (21)
-
Thanks so much for having me, Wired! :)
-
I sacrifice my queen all the time and nobody has accused me of being a bot. Just because I lose my game, doesn't mean I'm not cheating.
-
Me : " Blunders my Queen" Levy : He sacrificed the Queen. Only a bot can come up with that move.
-
I just love how if you're called a bot in literally any other game, it means you're really bad. But in chess, it means you're amazing
-
The most suspicious moves are not sacrificial moves, but weird positional stuff. Like moving the queen back one space because 5 moves later it's gonna save you a tempo.
-
One time I was playing against a guy and as I was about to checkmate he pulled out a comically large pawn and knocked down all my pieces and then told me I got pawned. I think he might have been cheating but idk, he said it was a hidden rule.
-
Levy in this video: "sacrificing pieces is something a human would never do, those moves are very bot-like" Levy on his main channel: THE ROOOOOOOOK
-
0:09 does make some sense because it’s checkmate in only 2, however a human would probably sac the bishop instead of queen but I think it’s because psychologically an opponent is way more likely to take a queen than bishop
-
Levy is so consistent that he has started posting on other channels too. Incredible
-
I'm a chess noob, but it looks to me like Wired cut the recording of Levy's computer move analysis into random confusing bits and pieces for dramatic effect because they don't trust their viewers to concentrate and stay attentive for more than 20 seconds.
-
0:54 3 huge questions 1. why does a treadmill have chess 2. why does it's chess contain a GM level AI 3. where can I get one
-
The first mate he used is actually a pretty common mating pattern, the sacrifice is nice but the double bishop mate is a bodens mate and ive practiced it a lot on lichess, i could totes see a player spotting that move
-
That was literally the most tame queen "sacrifice" ever. A human would absolutely play that move.
-
That example felt more like a normal chess puzzle than a cheater scenario, but other than that, great video.
-
‘A human would never play that move’ Me who makes random moves: you have yet to reach my level
-
Queen to D5 is actually a BRILLIANT move. It's Mate in 4.
-
As an AI, I can affirm his statements are indeed solid.
-
Tbh Levy explained it very well but the example could have been chosen better
-
I had a great game recently, I won with a dubious checkmate. I used the computer analysis to see what the computer thought of my game. I had a 66% accuracy lol
-
To be fair, at 0:01 there is no safe square for the Queen... And you would only have tonlook 2 moves ahead. That move alone seems very reasonable to me.
