WHY WG WON'T EVER REMOVE THIS TANK!

15,091
0
2024-04-23に共有
In today's video ill be playing in world of tanks Blitz and showcasing the FV215B 183 and why it wont be removed!

My Discord
discord.gg/WHptkMB

コメント (21)
  • @st.adm.
    DROODLES WEARING A SHIRT A SHIRT TO REVIEW THE 183
  • I like playing the 183, it's like rolling the dice, still better than buying crates.😅
  • @ifantyy
    I came from the future to tell you that they turned the 183 into a collector's tank
  • @coolenick0
    5m battles just this month is a heavily scuffed stat considering we had a dmg-based event.
  • @Ivan_756
    WG may have fixed the matchmaker BUT!! low roles are still going up now, idk why.
  • @k-132_44
    Imagine if WG replace the fv183 with 4005 stage I (First prototype). Both has same gun but irl 4005 stage 1 has autoloader and can shoot its 183 gun for every 7 second
  • When I first started wotb, my brother said not to get it because it was so overpowered I would get reported 💀
  • The tanks fine in its current form. But when other tanks got buffed. It should as well
  • @snafu2375
    On console it deals 1800 damage with 240 hesh pen
  • @Rip_matti
    Idk why but just wanna say that Droodles everytime when i feel bad just watching your videos literally playing wotb rn while crying idk why i am saying this but sorry and droodles you are a best wotb youtuber thank you❤ i was just wondering wanna play someday probaby dont bc u dont know me but thank you that you making so good wotb contect the best wotb creator is you
  • Not gonna say first but real quick wg wont remove because it's everybody's favorite tank it's a fun tank just like kv-2 got remove and came back after so much controversy just like it it will come back so wg won't waste time in it
  • Honestly if wg have plans on removing it, the reason SHOULD be because of the fact you need to adapt to a whole new way of playing TD, the whole 183 line features armored, sluggish tanks (like the E3 line) and you get a T10 glass cannon. The Badger fits better in the 183's position than the 183. Other reasons are either just skill issues or personal preferences.
  • Interesting review. I do see them a lot, but very rarely that they do good in the game or make a significant difference. Usually, they shoot once and get obliterated, but, yes, they can be extremely frustrating:)
  • @idi0t435
    Skilled 183 keeping an eye out on the heavy flank med, basically prevents steamrolling or rush or yolos etc. they are pretty much needed
  • It's not going to be removed because people just don't like it. A lot of people get mad because when they make a mistake in squishy tanks like the Leopard or the AMX 50B and a player in the 183 shoots at them. It's your fault for intentionall making that move knowing there's that tank in the corner, on the hill, or any area of the map. This tanks has gotten a buff sometime ago if you guy's haven't realized already, no it's not armor or gun dispersion etc. It's ammuntion! Yeah the 183 originally had 12 shells now it has 21 big difference now because you have more shells to work with. Well depending on the situation of the game now actually. As for whether the tank should be removed nerfed again, I "personally" think stay as it is, the camo however could be improve just bit nothing too crazy like in the old days. This tank has it's benifits however when you need to clear those event missions that requires massive amounts of damage. That would be all.
  • @elord4205
    droodles: like what is the counter to this tank me: MAUS
  • The 183 used to ruin in T10 game in the beginning. But after WG nerfed it several times it is rather a pin if you have on or even two in your team. Most player fire one or two shots and it done. so you end uo between 0 and 2j dmg. Ver hard to really influence the outcome of a game. Needs to be the right position on the right map and enought dumb reds